A recent study exploring gender equity and discrimination in academia -- purportedly the largest qualitative study of its kind --finds "quiet desperation" among academic women:
Interviews with 80 female faculty members at a research university — the largest qualitative study of its kind — have found that many women in careers are deeply frustrated by a system that they believe undervalues their work and denies them opportunities for a balanced life. While the study found some overt discrimination in the form of harassment or explicitly sexist remarks, many of the concerns involved more subtle “deeply entrenched inequities.”Of course, finding evidence of sex/gender discrimination in academia is hardly revelatory, but the specific themes through which the respondents experienced (or perceived) inequities may indeed offer new insights, providing what the author calls "a more nuanced perspective on discrimination and gender equity". They are:
- Subtle institutional and cultural patterns of discrimination
- Gender devaluation and holding positions of power
- Service is for women
- Perceptions of overt discrimination
- Career, family, and need for alternative models of professional success
Asked for a reaction to the study, Irvine released a statement criticizing it. “Professor Monroe’s article draws attention to the persistence and toll of sex discrimination on women faculty. Unfortunately, the article cannot to be said to offer original insight into the promise and challenge of gender equity in higher education. The formulation of the problem overlooks research in a host of related issues, such as gender schemas, work-life balance, and leadership development among others,” the statement said.However, Monroe notes that "many of the concerns expressed in the study didn’t have to do with official policies or programs, but with more subtle questions."

